|
|
|
fasddf fdsf
{K:-78} 11/11/2003
|
Nice. IR gives interesting results. Maybe the tree is just a bit overexposed, but the contrast with the sky is great.
|
|
|
|
|
Richard Ries
{K:614} 9/9/2002
|
Nice! It looks like a standoff between the willow with its "egg" (the rock) and the other tree on the left! This leads to a VERY minor quibble: if you print this, perhaps the trees on the right could be burned in to lessen their presence.
--Rich
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Murray
{K:43} 9/9/2002
|
Thanks for the praise.
The 1/125th @ F11 with a #25 red filter, Is what I found on a mailing list when I was looking up how to use IR film. I didn't do any correction for the polarizer, I just made sure I went out with it on a very bright day! And kept my back to the sun.
As for development, 5mins @ 68F in HC-110 (dil-b), I don't make stock solution, I dilute 1:31 for the most potent developer. I agitate once a minute for 5 seconds (inversion).
hth - Chris
|
|
|
|
|
John Myers
{K:4308} 9/9/2002
|
frikken...wow! love that IR effect...i have yet to try the film though. i think i will now:)
|
|
|
|
|
Glenn Michael Binkosky
{K:19} 9/9/2002
|
Chris, this image is beautiful use of infrared. Can you offer some technical info - on how you derived exposure, and how you developed your film. I've been playing with HIE, but my results have been poor - the negs are very thin - looking very badly underexposed. Any help would be appreciated...
|
|
|
|
|
Kevin Salter
{K:649} 9/9/2002
|
Hello Chris,
This is a stunning shot.No crits to offer, spot on!
Kev
|
|
0 
