|
|
ventrix drogo
{K:65398} 5/28/2004
|
Yes. Very good idea. Great image. I like it. Bye.
|
|
|
|
José Azevedo
{K:9845} 5/28/2004
|
Go for it! I wanna see the results. nice challenge you've got. I like discussions about photography. I?m elaborating one answer for a question about beauty you posted at the forum.
Guess you'll like it. I'll see if I can finish it tomorrow as I'm with lots of things to do.
See ya!
|
|
|
|
|
james mckenna
{K:6535} 5/28/2004
|
jose, thank you. you picked up the themes and feelings that were important to me as I made it, and that is gratifying. i've been thinking about this piece again lately, thinking of doing more with this exuberant feeling.
|
|
|
|
|
José Azevedo
{K:9845} 5/28/2004
|
Amazing, James. Not only for the positioning of each of the pictures, but for the whole work.
Why is it so appealing? Because it shows what we like, and don't, on people: expressions, emotions. This is an image that communicates because of both its simplicity and complexity, just like everybody.
Let's say the principle is simple (B&W), but the inside is complex (lots of expressions, moods, details that compose an individual's personality).
You were trying to reach an icon. Well, I've picked this one from your work. But don't stop convinced by my opinion. I'd like to pick others.
Ahn, sorry for rating it, but I couldn't resist. by the way it's the highest rate I've ever given. And it really deserves it.
Regards, Jose Azevedo.
|
|
|
|
|
michelle k.
{K:16270} 11/27/2003
|
just a cool collage, sir
|
|
|
|
|
Elin Cederholm
{K:36} 10/27/2003
|
Hi James!
My name is Elin, (nickname elin cederholm).. and you you comment my picture, and I'm very glad for your comment..i appriciate your view at the picture. (i'm always flattered to hear another persons wiew of my work.) I really like your pictures, and I think you are a great photographer!
|
|
|
|
|
scarlet james
{K:778} 10/14/2003
|
Like this work .. very strong, interestingly creative portfolio.. well done
|
|
|
|
|
james mckenna
{K:6535} 10/14/2003
|
"one filthier" -- the thought had crossed my mind...a few thousand times. i think the piece as a whole would be lopsided, though: bare bones don't have the stopping power of a sexy naked body. you give it a try, elin. you have a way with these things....
|
|
|
|
|
Former Member
{K:1287} 10/14/2003
|
Wow! reminds me of that movie... one hour photo!! love this!! i want to see one more filthier :)
|
|
|
|
|
António Vieira
{K:122} 9/25/2003
|
I like it. Nice composition.
|
|
|
|
Peter Burda
{K:4807} 9/23/2003
|
very nice work
|
|
|
|
|
james mckenna
{K:6535} 9/22/2003
|
william, thank you for your careful and thorough attention to this piece. i haven't a quibble with hardly anything you've written. i'm especially grateful that you notice there's no trace of hockney in this piece. i think that's a natural response by a lot of people who haven't encountered assembled images before: hockney they know, so hockney it is. you are dead on, as it were, in getting my intent for this side of "head." it was a fun hour and a half as i had tara do this, do that, sideways, lie down, dump water on her head, pout, eat, yell at me, sleep...a whole list of things. the light through the windows was perfect and she's a fabulous model. i took only four rolls, but i had more negatives than i needed. some really are pretty cool all by themselves. the assembly was entirely intuitive. i did put a fractured face on the right, in the middle (eye, nose and eye, mouth), and another near the top of the third column (eyes and nose, gaping mouth), but everything else was pure feel. i do like the one with her tongue sticking out, though, and that's as good a message as any for this side. i believe firmly that once work is out there it belongs to whoever claims it, though it's nice to know that intent still counts for something. thanks again for your careful attention. it is a thrill to see meaning being made.
|
|
|
|
|
Bad Site
{K:979} 9/22/2003
|
To fully appreciate this work, and it is a work not an image, is to spend at least 20-30 minutes going over it, checking out each of the individual images, anything less would be unfair to the artist and his intent. As I went over each of the images, up, down and across, the artists goal became clear, a human being living life to the fullest, and enjoying every minute of the ride. That is called (living).
The one image that my eye kept going back to is the third one from the top on the right, the sticking out of the tongue, sums up the work. Then again I could have missed the point here, it does happen.
The concept of course is not new but handled very well here. For those viewers who have problems visualizing the image full size, just keep working on it, the skill can be learned with practice, the reward is justified. I would love to see this work in it?s natural setting.
As far being related to the work of Hockney, i don?t think so. Hockney's photographs are cubist by design and execution, no similarly here.
Now I will go around back and see whats there.
|
|
|
|
|
Hugh Hill
{K:1618} 9/17/2003
|
there appears there is a chemistry here between artist and subject and I like what I see.
su-purb
|
|
|
|
Jose Ignacio (Nacho) Garcia Barcia
{K:96391} 9/16/2003
|
original.great composition.
|
|
|
|
|
Kim Culbert
{K:37070} 9/10/2003
|
Very original!! I bet this is super impressive hanging from the ceiling! I don't think it lacks punch... there's so much to look at and take in that it hits you that way. I took a look at the "dead" side and think that these work nicely together...
|
|
|
|
|
Rick Mccawley
{K:2878} 8/26/2003
|
This is a fun Hockneyesque piece. I like it alot but not a much as others you have done. I don't quite understand head dead and living.
reguards,
Rick
|
|
|
|
|
MaryBell
{K:32791} 8/26/2003
|
I think I balk at treating death as horror - given your explanation - it would be horror for those who live this way but - sometimes I find life to be much more horrible than death could possibly be...
|
|
|
|
|
james mckenna
{K:6535} 8/26/2003
|
size matters. the piece hangs nine feet high and six feet wide.
|
|
|
|
|
MaryBell
{K:32791} 8/25/2003
|
very conceptual but it lacks punch (at least in this format)
|
|
|
|
|
kathleen fonseca
{K:11992} 8/25/2003
|
great idea, James, wonderfully original, and a ton of frigging work!! i really love your philosophy and applauded your critique of "Sandy's Dreaming Of.." Your concept here is chillingly intellectual and precisely crafted. You said in your mail that "You work like a dog", it is all too plain to see that you do and i will be following your work with eager anticipation. regards: kat~
|
|
|
|
|
Robin McAulay
{K:8908} 8/25/2003
|
eye candy extreme.. very interesting :)
|
|
|
|
|
Igor L.
{K:7432} 8/25/2003
|
Beautiful composition! Great idea.
|
|
|
|
|
lowell whipple girbes
{K:13151} 8/25/2003
|
excellent !!!!!
|
|
|
|
zosia zija
{K:11106} 8/25/2003
|
fine idea!
|
|
|
|
André Bermak
{K:14443} 8/25/2003
|
Excelente composição!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
James H
{K:146} 8/25/2003
|
a unique idea, james. it appears as if many of those are strong shots on their own, and they make for an interesting compilation.
|
|
0 
![tara (detail of head [living])](http://thumbs.imageopolis.com/images/8/8/3/883/226276-Micro.jpg "tara (detail of head [living])")
