|
|
|
Gregory Fiedler
{K:15439} 7/23/2003
|
"Lassie! Timmy fell in the well!" Opps! Sorry! This is a great portrait. Beautiful colors and even more beautiful dog.
|
|
|
|
Gregory McLemore
{K:35129} 7/22/2003
|
Beautiful capture, very nicely done.
|
|
|
|
|
Robert Orlando
{K:1103} 7/22/2003
|
Well done it's a tad soft sharper focus would have made this image stand out.
|
|
|
|
|
Bob Tomerlin
{K:5460} 7/22/2003
|
David - normally, it would be preferable to see the dog's feet, too. But for this picture, that noble head rising out of the cloud of white fur is perfect. Good job.
You're right about the hot spot, but it's a pretty small area relative to the rest of the image. Maybe you could dodge that area in Photoshop or whatever program you use.
|
|
|
|
|
Kim Culbert
{K:37070} 7/22/2003
|
If you're not happy with the scan, try it again Dave. I'd love to see the finished product, as this does look a tad soft and the chest is blown out. Very pretty dog, though, with great DOF to pull her away from the background and make her the subject. That one ear sticking up is priceless!
|
|
|
|
|
Lenny Boguslaw
{K:243} 7/22/2003
|
Beautiful Animal
|
|
|
|
|
David Porter
{K:197} 7/22/2003
|
Jamie, yes I agree. I'm not sure what happened during the upload this time. I noticed the color cast as well. I'll probably pull it back and try again. The original doesn't have the cast and it's sharp as a tack. Scanners and computers....Arggghhhh!!
|
|
|
|
|
Jamie Ferguson
{K:6284} 7/22/2003
|
Oh My God David! Lassie has come home!
Its a lovely puppy portrait, the colour cast needs a bit of work though.
|
|
|
|
|
David Porter
{K:197} 7/22/2003
|
Thanks for taking a look Bob. I'm really disappointed in the quality of the scan though. It seems to have lost a lot of sharpness during the upload for whatever reason. The white seems a bit hot on her chest also. Oh well, I'm too tired to fuss with it tonight. Maybe I'll edit it when I have some time.
|
|
|
|
|
Bob Tilden
{K:1085} 7/22/2003
|
Refreshing; animals make great portraitures.
|
|
0 
