|
|
|
Kelly Ruston
{K:175} 8/25/2003
|
Thanks very much for all the suggestions! I've come away with a couple different ideas as to how to approach a sequence like this as a result. Not much riding time left in the season this far north, but I'm off to Whistler for a biking trip over the long weekend. With any luck, I'll have a bunch of new stuff to upload after that. Thanks again for the kind comments and useful advice!
|
|
|
|
|
Becky V
{K:9699} 8/24/2003
|
I can't give you any tips on techniques because I've never tried anything like this, but I really like the result! While I agree that having each shot of the biker progressively blur or fade away would look cool, I kind of like the shot as is, just because it looks so unique. It's all style preference, I suppose. You'll definitely have to do a lot of experimenting with this one.
My bone of contention with this photo isn't the biker. It's the background. This is a bit unfair because I know how hard it is to frame a moving target. But I find all the trees and people a bit overwhelming. Most of it can't be helped, but it would be nice to get a tighter shot of the biker - he kind of gets lost in everything else.
I definitely want to see more of these kinds of photos! :)
|
|
|
|
|
Kim Culbert
{K:37070} 8/22/2003
|
What stands out as awkard to me is that each shot of the rider is sooo vivid and clear. it might be nice to make the trailing shots faded a bit and keep the last one as solid. This way my eye won't be fighting to separate the images.
a very cool sequence though... great first try!
|
|
|
|
|
Andrew O'Rourke
{K:1602} 7/15/2003
|
I think you've come out with a very good composite. The one thing I noticed is the presence of spokes in some frames, suggesting fast shutter (which we know it is) and the lack of spokes in other frames. The technique has got to be pretty time consuming, but maybe try getting rid of all the spokes, it will suggest wheel spin and be uniform. If they are all the same they will be less noticable.
|
|
0 
