|
|
|
Andrew Lahanas
{K:7062} 4/13/2003
|
It doesn't look oversharpened to me, but maybe too much contrast. The bright parts are blinding and the dark parts are black as the ace of spades. Still I really like it. I like the way you can tell it's a reflection because the water has some ripling, instead of the usual perfectly still water reflection. I also like the idea of cropping the real duck/goose/critter thing out, and using the reflection as the sole subject. Very creative again Darrin, as usual.
|
|
|
|
|
Neil Shapiro
{K:2032} 4/13/2003
|
Good shot and symmetry. I think you had some very tough lighting conditions for this shot, and it does hurt the top portion a bit. The legs intrigue me a bit--is it lighting or are they really so black?
I think an interesting derivative of this shot would be to crop the real critter out just below his feet. The reflection is so good here it could be interesting on its own either in it's current position or inverted.
|
|
|
|
|
Keith Naylor
{K:13064} 4/13/2003
|
Darrin, this is a nice reflection, but I think its lost something in the PS work. Maybe its over sharpened, or levels have been too aggressively applied, especially to the upper half of the shot.
Or maybe the crop was from a much larger original. I don't know, I like the idea, but the execution lacks something.
|
|
|
|
|
Marco Grandi
{K:16680} 4/13/2003
|
Funny shot,Darrin,but beautiful reflection,contrast and colors!
Bye Marco.
|
|
|
|
Nando Mondino
{K:14261} 4/13/2003
|
Great!
|
|
|
|
|
Ronny Van Eeckhoutte
{K:12734} 4/13/2003
|
Very nice Darrin,good photo.
|
|
|
|
|
Sansone Iam
{K:572} 4/13/2003
|
Beautiful shot. Nice detail and clarity.
|
|
|
|
|
Eddy Meuwese
{K:165} 4/13/2003
|
Nice, but could use some more contrast on legs of animal
|
|
0 
