Thank you for the comment and the disagreement, Doyle! It always brings a bit of fresh air to the otherwise "yes, a very nice image" days! ;-)
Well, though discussing photography (and arts in general) has always been a minefield, the thing is that you have focus here, but selective focus on a scene that is usually captured with as big as possible DoF. It is only the foreground that is sharp in focus, leaving the rest quite blurry for a rather tired look. Of course unsharpness shouldn't be some kind of excuse that automatically converst anything to arts, but it can be used to supply much which remainds out of range in an "all sharp" image.
I don't think that your are "unqualified for critique" so please feel free to even devastate my "artistic dreams". ;-)
Ok. Well . . . I guess I'd have to disagree. :) (What's new, huh?). I prefer FOCUS! LoL! Since it's "Not my cup of tea" . . . I feel unqualified to critique. ;)
Thanks for the idea Mark! I have to try some sgots the way you said.
I was thinking about that kind of sight that one has, when walking rather tired and focusing at the very near objects. So I used the widest possible apperture and focued extremely close.
0 
