|
|
|
Twisted Rich
{K:691} 5/10/2006
|
You are beautiful!!!
|
|
|
|
|
Joe Plocki
{K:779} 5/2/2006
|
Haunting, and beautiful. And yes, hot. From the comments already posted, I'm guessing this is you - excellent job on composition, not being able to frame it in the viewfinder, too. For whatever it's worth, I'm bookmarking your portfolio page - I'm liking pretty much everything I've seen so far.
|
|
|
|
|
Stef Van Springel
{K:75} 4/23/2006
|
Awesome!!! I like the low saturation. Prefer this one for the colored one. Also the use of light and the expression are great!
Congrats,
Stefan
|
|
|
|
Marco Maresca
{K:14418} 4/4/2006
|
Fantastic portrait dear Tanya!!! Splendid work!
|
|
|
|
|
Jonathan Horgan
{K:105} 2/19/2006
|
i really like it, very interesting
|
|
|
|
eleonora frago
{K:2472} 1/9/2006
|
angelica e diabolica contemporaneamente!
fantastica :)
eleonora
|
|
|
|
Chase Wilson
{K:478} 12/26/2005
|
Love the picture, I'm kinda glad I don't see dead people! LOL Well done.
Chase
|
|
|
|
|
Tom Ross
{K:6453} 12/4/2005
|
Perfect. The expression makes it but the technical work really finishes this exceptional image.
|
|
|
|
Igor Sivjakov
{K:4671} 10/25/2005
|
Perfect!
7/7
Igor
|
|
|
|
t marie
{K:302} 10/15/2005
|
ohhh i get it...
it only gives you the info from the original file...which i have long since deleted..ohwell. in the future i will include all that info;)
|
|
|
|
Martin .
{K:24957} 10/14/2005
|
Tanya,
You truly need a Crucifix hanging around your neck on this one, but otherwise you rock my friend?
Well done indeed,
Martin
I hope you don?t mind, but since I see dead people too, I did play about with the contrast, brightness and color just a bit?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Etienne
{K:4192} 10/10/2005
|
Tanya, mon amour,
What an exquisite look. I love the color and lack of color at the same time. Beautiful photo, VERY beautiful lady!!!
BTW, if you promise to bring this very sexy look with you, Norway is a go!!! Drop me a line and we'll work out the details... oak.etienne@gmail.com
Merci, merci beaucoup!!!
Etienne
|
|
|
|
Paul Lara
{K:88111} 10/9/2005
|
Tanya, when I use either ACDSee or Photoshop CS, I have access to that data. In Photoshop, its in the Metadata tab, and is listed as 'Camera Data (EXIF)'.
|
|
|
|
|
t marie
{K:302} 10/8/2005
|
hmm....exif doesn't give me any info on the picture...except for the resolution=/
is there another way to get this info?
btw- THANKS!! =)
|
|
|
|
|
Paul Lara
{K:88111} 10/8/2005
|
Yeah, I laugh when uploading a photo like this to Usefilm, when I get to the part that requires me to categorize it as EITHER color or B&W.
A couple of things that would help others from your art is better use of the forms we fill out:
- I usually add after 17-85 (awesome lens, isn't it?) what specific focal length it was shot at.
- On film, digital is understood with a 20D, so I use that slot to let folks know my ISO speed.
- You can also consult Photoshop for the shutter and aperture used on that shot ( I LOVE EXIF).
...just a suggestion.
|
|
|
|
|
Paul Lara
{K:88111} 10/8/2005
|
the soft lighting is battling against the pseudo-evil stare, Tanya, and emotionally, I think the soft lighting wins.
I like the tight crop and low contrast. They work well together.
|
|
|
|
Ian McIntosh
{K:42997} 10/8/2005
|
Yes pale is!
The eyes maintain their gloss here.
|
|
|
|
Rob Graziano
{K:6678} 10/8/2005
|
I like it...what a look! I don't think the eyes should have whiter...would throw off the whole mood of the piece.
|
|
|
|
|
t marie
{K:302} 10/8/2005
|
thank you=)
self portaits are fun..i think i look pretty evil in this one;)
|
|
|
|
|
David Hofmann
{K:22223} 10/8/2005
|
I agree, comparing both I like the less saturated version better, too. The other one seems a little too rich.
I wasn't aware it was a self portrait. You are really pretty. I did only one atempt on a self portrait and all I could come up with was making me look evil :) :)
|
|
|
|
|
John Lamb
{K:9687} 10/8/2005
|
An intriguing portrait Tanya. I think maybe the whites of the eyes could be just a little lighter. Nice work. regards John
|
|
|
|
|
t marie
{K:302} 10/8/2005
|
thanks hun...i think i like it better like this better than the more saturated one i posted earlier this month...
<3
|
|
|
|
|
t marie
{K:302} 10/8/2005
|
thank you so much:)
|
|
|
|
|
mundh
{K:3974} 10/8/2005
|
this is excellent.
|
|
|
|
|
David Hofmann
{K:22223} 10/8/2005
|
looks great, very soft transition. Beautiful
|
|
|
|
|
t marie
{K:302} 10/8/2005
|
someone on this site asked me how it looked a bit lighter...so i ran it through photoshop and desaturated it a little;)
thanks
<3
|
|
|
|
|
elizabeth barnes
{K:353} 10/8/2005
|
Very angelic...how did you do that?
|
|
0 
