|
|
|
Jani Salvataggio
{K:27283} 8/2/2005
|
Very very beautiful!!!!
regards
Jani
|
|
|
|
|
Brad Morris
{K:3307} 8/1/2005
|
Hi Rog, I think t\you are right. the B&W treatment works well here. Reminds me I should do some more B&Ws. I have been neglecting them too.
Composition is wonderful. I think that I might have enev reduced the DOF even more to completely throw the trees out of focus to direct attention to the detail in the foreground
|
|
|
|
Mary Brown
{K:71879} 7/31/2005
|
The architechure of the building and lantern are very lovely. B&W certainly does suit this beautiful composition.
Mary
|
|
|
|
Roger Williams
{K:86139} 7/30/2005
|
So, Matej, you think the background could well have been even softer? That didn't occur to me, I'm afraid. The lantern's pedestal is truly vertical, but the lantern itself is nodding slightly to the right. A rather confusing effect.
|
|
|
|
Matej Maceas
{K:24381} 7/29/2005
|
Now, is there anyone else who gets the impression the lantern might be leaning towards the right? The funny thing is, I measured the angle in photoshop and it is actually quite straight...
Have you by any chance also taken this with a wider aperture? I suspect blurring the background more (but not necessarily to the point of making it unrecognisable) would have also been worthwhile.
|
|
|
|
|
Keith Naylor
{K:13064} 7/29/2005
|
Hi Roger,
well all I can say is you have nailed this one. Tones are perfect, as is the composition, and the softness of the background really doesn't enter the equation. Brilliant.
Keith
|
|
|
|
|
Galal El Missary
{K:84569} 7/29/2005
|
Great composition Roger , nice tones & Details .
Galal
|
|
0 
