|
|
Serge Moscow
{K:-2917} 2/3/2005
|
David, I understand yours words about "here" and appreciate such property of panoramic shots.
But I believe that general principles of composition are valid in this case also.
In yours case you used only 2 shots and disbalance between left and right parts is quite evident, imho.
There is only one excepion from composition principles - when you documented situation (view) around you. If this is a fine photo, these priniciples must be taken into consideration.
Of course, this is my imho only:)
Regards,
Serge
|
|
|
|
|
David Tasker
{K:4281} 2/3/2005
|
Hi Serge, I see your point - what you ahve to consider is the nature of a panorama. I see a panorama as a means of depicting a sense of "the place" - It's a little hard for me to explain but I ahve always felt that a panorama composition defeats the traditional "rule of thirds" for composition. I think waht I am trying to say is - This panorama shows t\you what it is like "here" - your crop might make more sense technically - but it loses the sense of the place. I do thank you for taking the time to comment. I hope you look at the other images from my trip - I am showing of Tasmania - not my photographic skills :-)
|
|
|
|
|
Serge Moscow
{K:-2917} 2/2/2005
|
Hill from the left looks a little bit too large in comparison with right part of the shot.
Regards,
Serge
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carsten Ranke
{K:14476} 2/2/2005
|
Very nice pano, and no seams visible - good stitching job !
|
|
|
|
|
Fabrizio Fiorucci
{K:4871} 2/2/2005
|
Very sharp and with a wonderful sky... congratulations for putting it together manually!
|
|
0 
