Photograph By Judita Sendak
Judita S.
Photograph By Jan Symank
Jan S.
Photograph By Art McCaffrey
Art M.
Photograph By Srna Stankovic
Srna S.
Photograph By Jan Symank
Jan S.
Photograph By Radovan Magdalenic
Radovan M.
Photograph By Paul Freeman
Paul F.
Photograph By Nanda Baba das
Nanda B.
 
imageopolis Home Sign Up Now! | Log In | Help  

Your photo sharing community!

Your Photo Art Is Not Just A Fleeting Moment In Social Media
imageopolis is dedicated to the art and craft of photography!

Upload
your photos.  Award recipients are chosen daily.


Editors Choice Award  Staff Choice Award  Featured Photo Award   Featured Critique Award  Featured Donor Award  Best in Project Award  Featured Photographer Award  Photojournalism Award

Imageopolis Photo Gallery Store
Click above to buy imageopolis
art for your home or office
.
 
  Find a Photographer. Enter name here.
    
Share On
Follow Us on facebook 

 


Send this photo as a postcard
Flower
 
Send this image as a postcard
  
Image Title:  Flower
  0
Favorites: 1 
 By: Amanda Hensley  
  Copyright ©2004

Register or log in to view this image at its full size, to comment and to rate it.


This photo has won the following Awards




 Projects & Categories

 Browse Images
  Recent Pictures
  Todays Pictures
  Yesterdays Pictures
  Summary Mode
  All imageopolis Pictures
 
 Award Winners
  Staff Choice
  Editors Choice
  Featured Donors
  Featured Photographers
  Featured Photos
  Featured Critiques
   
 Image Options
  Unrated Images
  Critique Only Images
  Critiquer's Corner
  Images With No Critiques
  Random Images
  Panoramic Images
  Images By Country
  Images By Camera
  Images By Lens
  Images By Film/Media
   
 Categories
   
 Projects
   
 Find Member
Name
User ID
 
 Image ID
ID#
 
   
 Search By Title
 
   

Photographer  Amanda Hensley {Karma:360}
Project #29 B&W Flower Camera Model Canon AE-1 Program
Categories Nature
Florals
Film Format
Portfolio Nature
Lens Vivitar 70-300mm
Uploaded 4/22/2004 Film / Memory Type Kodak  T-Max
    ISO / Film Speed 400
Views 442 Shutter 1/125
Favorites Aperture f/5.6
Critiques 5 Rating
Pending
/ 2 Ratings
Location City - 
State -  KENTUCKY
Country - United States   United States
About My first time developing my own film and prints :D
Random Pictures By:
Amanda
Hensley


Couple

Cemetery

WTC building #7

AngelSeries

Angels Series

Walking with rose

Color

...*~!~*...

Window

Flower

There are 5 Comments in 1 Pages
  1
Matej Maceas Matej Maceas   {K:24381} 5/10/2004
I wouldn't call it washed out so much as lacking in contrast. It's hard to judge properly in digital form because everyone's monitor is different, but from what I see on my screen, the photo could stand slightly brighter highlights and quite a bit deeper blacks. The question remains whether this lack of contrast is due to scanning or whether it's on the print. Scanners do tend to do weird things to tonality, and it can be difficult to match scan to print because on the monitor, the image should be viewed in a pitch-dark room, while quite the opposite applies to the print. So in the end, only you can safely judge whether the print has the tonal range that you wanted.

I agree with Sérgio that it's good to scan B&W photos in colour mode, but I don't agree that you should afterwards convert them to greyscale. Insofar as I understand the process, conversion to greyscale compresses the available information into a much smaller set of tones. The other problem with greyscale is that you'll notice that some paper + developer combos give results which, although they are B&W, are very different from the cold, sterile tones of digital greyscale. And I suspect that after uploading to the web, the images get converted to sRGB anyway.

So much for technical talk. Keep shooting & posting & most importantly, having fun!

  0


Sérgio Vieira   {K:3384} 4/24/2004
Amanda,

this one is amazing just the way it is! I love the pureness in the flower and motion that the background inspires. It gives you the feeling you're under whater.

Your scaner problem isn?t only the washed out. For what I know everytime you scan a photo you should compensate the loss in light, contrast and sharpness. Only scanning like velvia slides I don?t have the need to improve the scanning, It doesn?t actually do a thing.
I also believe you are scanning your b&w photos in colour, it is good that you scan them like that to preserve the most of the original, but then you should put them in greyscale after editing. I?ve noticed that they still are in RGB.

Well but this one doesn't loose a thing on account of that, it even improves it!
I think you should choose B&W Flower under Projects, because this is not an ordinary flower shot.

Best regards,
Sérgio

  0


Drew Brashler   {K:750} 4/23/2004
just a tid bit. Its from your scanner, everyone has that problem, just take it into a photo editing program and do a bit of contrast and brightness, and it should fix it right up. I hate flatbed scaners. Thats what your using to get it posted right? *crosses fingers* :-)

  0


Amanda Hensley   {K:360} 4/23/2004
Are my pictures looking washed out?

  0


Drew Brashler   {K:750} 4/23/2004
Sweet. I remember the first time devolping my film this semester, it was kinda creepy, cause i thought i was going to screw something up. i didn't... so yay. But yea keep it up. Do you have an image editing program. Cause you scanning your pictures on like a flatbed scanner would make your pictures look really washed out. so if you have an image editing program, do a bit with the contrast and brightness of the picture, and then it should look like your original. Anyway have a good day.

Drew

  0


  1

 

|  FAQ  |  Terms of Service  |  Donate  |  Site Map  |  Contact Us  |  Advertise  |

Copyright ©2013 Absolute Internet, Inc - All Rights Reserved

Elapsed Time:: 0.3320313