|
|
|
ana ribeiro
{K:21290} 8/7/2003
|
a great photo !!
i was surching the muslim....couldnt find
|
|
|
|
|
rich e jones
{K:318} 8/1/2003
|
maybe a little to dark, because you invite us in to this mess, now i want to see all the little parts.
|
|
|
|
|
Andre Fersen
{K:1679} 8/1/2003
|
Funny, people are giving this low ratings...because of the subject matter! Let me go through the things and say what I think one by one:
1. Composition. Not so bad, as it shows a mess, and it shows it effectively.
2. Lighting. If you were rtying to simulate daylight, it didn't work. The light has a trypical on-camera flash look - intensity is concentrated in front of the camera and fals off rapidly as you get further away. On the other hand, the lighting suits the subject - grungey.
3. Originality: original subject, yes. Original treatment...not very, since it looks as if you just stood in front of the scene and aimed the camera and pressed the button. But I can't think of any alternatives.
4. emotional appeal: Actually, it has tons of emotional appeal. What people mean when they down-rate is that they don't like thew subject matter.
5. Overall: I like this photo, it makes me think. The very simple snap-shot style suits the subject matter. Yes, I like it.
|
|
|
|
luisa vassallo
{K:28230} 8/1/2003
|
oh yes, a tornado!!
good idea!
|
|
|
|
|
Gregory Fiedler
{K:15439} 8/1/2003
|
Doc What The..............Sorry about the rate, but I can only guess what had happened, you don't want to know how I psychoanalyzed this. Or maybe you would!
|
|
|
|
|
Bob Tomerlin
{K:5460} 8/1/2003
|
Its hard to understand why you took this picture without any explanation. I guess somebody moved out???
|
|
|
|
|
Bob Stapleton
{K:575} 8/1/2003
|
the morning after what? a tornado?
|
|
0 
