-Is it agreeable? somebody asked. - Neither agreeable nor disagreeable. It just is. -What about spatial relationships?" the investigator inquired. -There are plenty. But It was difficult to answer. True, the perspective looked rather odd. But these were not the really important facts. The really important facts were that spatial relationships had ceased to matter very much and that my mind was perceiving the world in terms of other than spatial categories. At ordinary times the eye concerns itself with such problems as Where? - How far? How situated in relation to what? .. . Place and distance cease to be of much interest. The mind does its Perceiving in terms of intensity of existence, profundity of significance, relationships within a pattern. And along with indifference to space there went an even more complete indifference to time. "There seems to be plenty of it," was all I would answer, when the investigator asked me to say what I felt about time. Plenty of it, but exactly how much was entirely irrelevant.
The perfection is this as photo. I remembered the book of CAMUS. The STRANGER.. The about you wrote about time and the Existansialism perfectly match in this image..
4 
{K:78768} 5/28/2015
