Photograph By Gregory McLemore
Gregory M.
Photograph By Michael Berry
Michael B.
Photograph By Bogdan Lutostanski
Bogdan L.
Photograph By Robert Gaither
Robert G.
Photograph By Nuno Milheiro
Nuno M.
Photograph By Jill Bartlett
Jill B.
Photograph By David Rodriguez
David R.
Photograph By The Pilgrim
The P.
 
imageopolis Home Sign Up Now! | Log In | Help  

Your photo sharing community!

Your Photo Art Is Not Just A Fleeting Moment In Social Media
imageopolis is dedicated to the art and craft of photography!

Upload
your photos.  Award recipients are chosen daily.


Editors Choice Award  Staff Choice Award  Featured Photo Award   Featured Critique Award  Featured Donor Award  Best in Project Award  Featured Photographer Award  Photojournalism Award

Imageopolis Photo Gallery Store
Click above to buy imageopolis
art for your home or office
.
 
  Find a Photographer. Enter name here.
    
Share On
Follow Us on facebook 

 



  Photography Forum: Camera Equipment News Forum: 
  Q. Kodak High Definition (HD) Film - used it yet ?

Asked by Mike Jones    (K=696) on 12/27/2003 
I've been seeing ads on Canadian TV for the new Kodak HD film (I haven't seen any USA ads yet). Anyhow a local camera shop has it available so I bought some to try out. The TV ads that I've seen have a Consumer slant to them - even though Kodak put this film in the Pro section of their website.

According to the Kodak website - the 400 (HD4) film has a finer grain than the old iso200. At $5.00 a roll - they should have named it "Kodak Gold" ;-)

Anyhow - has anyone used this stuff yet. I'm still on the first roll. Any differences in how to use it - cool things that you can do ? How does it scan ? How heavy towards the Red ? How about astrophotography ?

Thanks,
-Mike


    



 Eveline Shih-Pitcairn   (K=4406) - Comment Date 12/29/2003
Kodak HD film is repackaged Kodak Royal film.
It is a bit sharper, a little more higher contrast and higher saturation than the Kodak Gold or Kodak Max.
I've been told it is similar to the Portra VC films but created for the amateur market.

I haven't used it for astrophotography, but for Pacific Island (Hawaii, Tahiti, and the like) and California beach picts, it comes out postcard-like great!





 Eveline Shih-Pitcairn   (K=4406) - Comment Date 12/31/2003
By the way, here's a copy of some replies from another related thread:

Charles Morris 09/18/2003

Posting images online won't tell you much about this film. the only good way to see what it can do is to get some enlargements made or use a loupe to look at the negatives. i have used it since it became available to me locally and here are some observations.

it offers more saturated colors especially reds and blues. comparing high definition to kodak gold 400 is sort of like comparing portra NC to portra VC. it is just brighter, i think a bit warmer. sometimes too bright to the point of rendering large areas of one of these colors as a single shade.

the grain does seem to be finer. i can't print color in my darkroom but the enlarger offers some insight magnifying the negatives from various other films. looking at the negatives on the baseboard at what would be a 20x30 enlargement, it is clear grain is finer in the film, where gold 400 this is pretty evident. again, this color saturation issue shows up, it seems to be a bit higher contrast, but bright colors are sometimes flattened to a single tone. the negative shows some variation and tones that so far none of the printers i have used can seem to get on paper.

this is still a new product. many of the printers have not developed a workflow that can take advantage of this film. i have not tried one of the kodak "perfect touch" labs yet, but one pro lab locally, and some of the better labs that use fuji frontier print systems have tried to get some tones out of reds and the images just look flat. where portra would give me a nice range of transisitons that show the texture of say, a red blanket in a baby picture, with high definition i don't see that in the prints even though i can see it on the negatives.

i will keep using this film off and on but until i see some improvments in the process/printing i can get locally without spending a mint for professional prints, i will stick with using it for outdoors shots that could benefit form the saturated colors,but don't have to preserve skin tones.

2cents@large.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Elangovan S USEFILMDONOR 09/19/2003

As Charles mentioned, I think, this film produces a very nice saturated colors. Well, I kinda like satautrated images. Its very fine grain film. I really liked it.

Here are some pictures for sample. These were processed with Kodak processing.

[Photo Critique Image http://www.usefilm.com/image/190589.html]
[Photo Critique Image http://www.usefilm.com/image/191763.html]

Elangs.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Mark Beltran USEFILMDONOR 09/18/2003

Elangs, those are really good examples. I can tell especially with the red painted chair. Very good definition, fine detail, and the reds are out of this world.




Log in to post a response to this question

 

 

Return To Photography Forum Index
|  FAQ  |  Terms of Service  |  Donate  |  Site Map  |  Contact Us  |  Advertise  |

Copyright ©2013 Absolute Internet, Inc - All Rights Reserved

Elapsed Time:: 0.125