Photograph By Shirley D. Cross-Taylor
Shirley D. C.
Photograph By roger bourland
roger b.
Photograph By Behyar Yasan
Behyar Y.
Photograph By Gustavo Scheverin
Gustavo S.
Photograph By Art McCaffrey
Art M.
Photograph By Barbara Socor
Barbara S.
Photograph By Darryl  Barclay
Darryl  B.
Photograph By stingRay pt.4 .
stingRay pt.4 ..
 
imageopolis Home Sign Up Now! | Log In | Help  

Your photo sharing community!

Your Photo Art Is Not Just A Fleeting Moment In Social Media
imageopolis is dedicated to the art and craft of photography!

Upload
your photos.  Award recipients are chosen daily.


Editors Choice Award  Staff Choice Award  Featured Photo Award   Featured Critique Award  Featured Donor Award  Best in Project Award  Featured Photographer Award  Photojournalism Award

Imageopolis Photo Gallery Store
Click above to buy imageopolis
art for your home or office
.
 
  Find a Photographer. Enter name here.
    
Share On
Follow Us on facebook 

 



  Photography Forum: Photography Help Forum: 
  Q. Kodak Portra

Asked by David JFW    (K=79) on 4/11/2004 
At usefilm.com, I imagined there might be a forum to ask a question about the relative merits of various 35mm-films. "Equipment News" is the closest category I found. I have read of one photographer who uses Portra exclusively and wanted to find out what properties made it more desirable to use than Max. I have heard that it was "designed for shooting people." Does that include people in the ebony to caramel range or does this description fit only the folks for whom "skin tone" [sic] band-aids are made?

david


    



 Peter Witkop   (K=3189) - Comment Date 4/12/2004
Portait films aren't nessicarilly tuned to cerntain skin tones. The characteristics of good portrait film is that it have neutral color rendition, and relativly low contrast. Color rendition of course wants to be neutral since you don't ussually want people to have color casts (that aren't part of their skin tone). Low contrast is good because people generally look better with lower contrast, and lower contrast films don't saturate color as quickly (particularly reds, the color of most skin imprefections), so skin imprefections are more subtle. Lower contrast also helps with getting good detail in a brides white dress, and her grooms black tux. If kodak Max works for you, and gives you the result you want, that's the more desirable film. Personally I find Max to be pretty grainy in comparison to pro films (such as portra from Kodak, or NPS and NPH from fuji), and I don't like the color, I think it's a bit too saturated for people which is what I ussually use color neg films for. Hope that helps make things a little more clear.

Peter





 David JFW   (K=79) - Comment Date 4/14/2004
Thank you, Peter. That is most helpful.

david






Log in to post a response to this question

 

 

Return To Photography Forum Index
|  FAQ  |  Terms of Service  |  Donate  |  Site Map  |  Contact Us  |  Advertise  |

Copyright ©2013 Absolute Internet, Inc - All Rights Reserved

Elapsed Time:: 0.1445313