|
|
|
ade mcfade
{K:12388} 2/14/2005
|
nice and crisp for 2 mins Nidge.
I've just started gniog RAW full time now, realised that for browsing purposes that you can extract the JPG into the folder so you don't ahve the huge wait for the RAW to render.
The quality difference is amazing.
Ade
|
|
|
|
|
Nigel Smith
{K:591} 1/31/2005
|
Thank you Nicole. I'm still very much a newbie when it comes to post processing so don't be surprised if I pop up asking for tips with Photoshop.
Regards
Nidge.
|
|
|
|
|
Nigel Smith
{K:591} 1/31/2005
|
Yes James it was through the same light pollution. It didn't help with the subject being above a house roof and the image distorting due to the rising heat. The trick is to take many images in the hope of getting one back.
|
|
|
|
|
Nigel Smith
{K:591} 1/31/2005
|
Thank you Khaled. The next step will be to increase the exposure time by combining many images.
|
|
|
|
Khaled Mursi Hammoud
{K:54005} 1/31/2005
|
Excellent image Nigel, bravo,
Khaled.
|
|
|
|
|
James Silcock
{K:12501} 1/31/2005
|
You have captured this one superbly, was this through the same light pollution? If so, excellent.
|
|
|
|
Nicole Marcisz
{K:10268} 1/31/2005
|
wow, neat! thanks for sharing.
Cheers,
nicole
|
|
|
|
Paul Boocock
{K:8314} 1/31/2005
|
Wow - I've seen this star cluster many times but not like this, even with binoculars; too much light pollution in the smoke!
|
|
0 
