Vandi, did you made that yourself? If so, then really a very original, very well thought out work. Exactly the kind of work that reconstructs the things that are in mind, and as such it could be named a photography of the own thoughts, even if they do not seem to state something that is unambiguously definable.
Just for the record, and quite contrary to the many that will name this "an abstract" just because it doesn't seem to represent anything "known", it is not abstract. It represents the things existing in the own mind, and thus it is a depiction of something. Things that look "absurd" are not necessarily abstracts. This is of course only for the classification (if possible) and not for the quality of your work. The quality is very very high no matter if we name it "an abstract" or anything else.
Such images of course offer myriads of ways for interpretation. I see quite a humorous statement about the useless efforts to make the fatal climb up the realms of what we name "time", but time passes us by. No matter how long the ladder is, the sequence of ticks of the clock will be at least one tick longer. And this even if one would add another step to the ladder. Then it also seems to me that this is related to the problem of infinity in its definition. I take the example of the well known definition:
Chicken = Successor of egg Egg = Successor of chicken
which appears (for my thinking) on your image as a search. The chicken searches which egg it came from, and faces the pathology of the situation, which goes back to the pathology of the given definition itself. Following this definition it can't do anything but face the result of the definition. There is no definite egg it came out from. So the definition does represent infinity but does not represent the physical line of evolution, since the later doesn't extend to infinity toward the past. (Even the universe had a start and before the start there is no time.) So we have a fine distinction here, between mathematics and physics, since mathematics are able to produce much more things than physics. It doesn't matter if they don't exist physically. They exist mentally and that's enough existance for mathematics. ;-)
Now, add the photorealistic attitude of the image, its nice inclusion of geometrical perspective, the details of the elements of which it consists, and the reconstruction of the fuzzy image in mind is done very well.
0 
{K:127263} 7/21/2009
