|
|
|
siddhardha garige
{K:1746} 10/22/2005
|
Thanks for the info. I am sure you know much more than me in this area.
|
|
|
|
|
Bhaskar A. V.
{K:1246} 10/22/2005
|
Any day for this kind of pictures B&W or Sepia would be the best. Your selection of B&W or a duetone I would say is certainly better than colour. I agree the background could have been different especially when her hair colour is in that tone. Too sharp: Yes the diaphram was f16.0 because the final enlargement in print was 30 inches by 20 inches. I had no choice except to use f16.0, I hope my explanations are acceptable. A V Bhaskar-India
|
|
|
|
|
siddhardha garige
{K:1746} 10/22/2005
|
I did follow your guidelines in a couple of portarits i did. But here to be frank, here are couple of issues i see.
1). Background is not giving a good feel
2). too sharp
i woked on b&w one hope you dont mind pls let me know what do you think.
|
|
|
|
|
|
murat sinen
{K:558} 8/16/2005
|
great beautifull different back groun would give more impact
|
|
|
|
Brian Rueger
{K:7341} 8/15/2005
|
Great portrait. Very sharp.
|
|
|
|
|
Antonio Trincone
{K:23167} 8/14/2005
|
how much history inside her beatiful eyes you spot very well here
|
|
|
|
|
gianpaolo reggi
{K:2841} 8/14/2005
|
Wow compliments,great shot.
|
|
|
|
Christian Tropea
{K:2052} 8/14/2005
|
Adoro i ritratti questo viso e' molto espressivo e vissuto stupendo. Vienimi a trovare
Christian
|
|
0 
