|
Todd Weeks
{K:7636} 7/27/2005
|
Pierre,
I'm not so sure about rotating it. It has two different peaks, which might be misleading. I also think it has sunk in the back. Or it just needs rotating. ;^)
Todd
|
|
|
Pierre Martin
{K:3355} 7/27/2005
|
That's a nice composition, Todd! I would add that the image needs to be rotated ever so slightly clock-wise.
|
|
|
Todd Weeks
{K:7636} 7/26/2005
|
Shane,
I think I have to learn more about image processing. I'm glad you like the colour version. I think I prefer it as well.
Todd
|
|
|
Shane Finnigan
{K:1990} 7/26/2005
|
Hi Todd,
I agree with Mary. The colours are what really kick in this shot. Both crops work for me but I would process out the electrical wires. Excellent composition! Well done, and great eye!!!
|
|
|
Todd Weeks
{K:7636} 7/17/2005
|
Thanks for the suggestion, Mary. This photo seems to have stirred up interest. Thanks to all for taking the time to post.
Todd
|
|
|
Mary Brown
{K:71879} 7/17/2005
|
I came back and saw your B&W version. Here's what I like--the new crop of the b&W but with the colour of the first. The colour, to me, is richer and makes the place 'real'. Mary
|
|
|
Todd Weeks
{K:7636} 7/17/2005
|
Hi Mary,
I already posted a B&W version. Look up. ;^)
Thanks for commenting.
Todd
|
|
|
Mary Brown
{K:71879} 7/17/2005
|
Todd, it looks lovely like this. Great shadowing. I'm anxious to see your B&W version. Mary
|
|
|
Charles Dias
{K:1376} 7/15/2005
|
Todd .. I think your BW conversion is too dark and lacks contrast ... the electricity wires still there ... take a look in my conversion, i simulated the use of a green filter and punch the contrast a little. The wires was removed.
|
|
|
Todd Weeks
{K:7636} 7/14/2005
|
Charles,
Attached is a B&W version.
Todd
|

|
|
|
Todd Weeks
{K:7636} 7/14/2005
|
Charles,
You know, you're right. I'm going to try a re-crop and edit. I'll post it when I'm done.
Todd
|
|
|
Charles Dias
{K:1376} 7/14/2005
|
Interesting subject. I think composition is too centralized. This image would be much better in BW.
|
|