|
Mary Therese Marie's Photos
{K:2174} 7/31/2004
|
Hi Jimmy,
well I figured out you are correct in the pixel idea but the file must not exceed 360k in size and I have to downside the pixel part to stay within the parameter of 360k... at least I think that's the deal with that.
:)
Mary
|
|
|
Jimmy Payne
{K:21163} 7/30/2004
|
Mary, are you sure the statement does not read "at least 400x400 pixels and not more than 800x800"?
Regards, Jimmy
|
|
|
Mary Therese Marie's Photos
{K:2174} 7/30/2004
|
Hi Jimmy,
I see what you mean but when I add photo from the usefilm site they state I have to have my picture at 400 pixels under certain amount of kb so I when I donwload my file I always resize the image to 400 pixels. If it is larger then the usefilm site doesn't accept my download.
:)
Mary
|
|
|
Jimmy Payne
{K:21163} 7/30/2004
|
Mary, I like the way you composed this shot with emphasis on the one stone that seems out of place with all the other uniform grave markers. May I suggest uploading your postings in a larger size? I upload most of mine somewhere around 800x600 pixels and try to keep the size to around 120kb even though UF allows around 300kb. I'm sure many UF users have dial-up internet service and even 100kb size pictures load slowly with dial-up. As an example of how your shot will look if posted larger, I have taken the liberty to enlarge your photo to 719x491 as seen here.
|
|
|
|
Stephen Bivens
{K:7308} 7/28/2004
|
Let's hit the road !
|
|
|
Jeff Fiore
{K:11277} 7/28/2004
|
Nice! Has an infrared quality ot it.
|
|
|
Ozjan Yeshar
{K:15239} 7/27/2004
|
Very dramatic in B&W. Cheers.
|
|