|
|
Verena Rentrop
{K:15233} 4/9/2004
|
@Ian, lets pay Hugo what ever he deserves ;)
|
|
|
|
|
Verena Rentrop
{K:15233} 4/9/2004
|
@Hugo, admitted, your version is more dramatically...
I see, still a lot of space for learning :)
I'll try my very best!
Cheers,
Verena
|
|
|
|
Ian McIntosh
{K:42997} 4/8/2004
|
Hah!
Demo, wouldn't you just love to be paid to do it.
Hugo's right, isn't he. We should be paying him.
Is this an old hospital and have you seen these guys?
Leslie Hancock (love his B7W palette)http://www.usefilm.com/photographer/23620.html
Dmitri Gringauz http://www.usefilm.com/image/410255.html
Busy now will come back later.
|
|
|
|
|
Ian McIntosh
{K:42997} 4/8/2004
|
I did guffaw.
Nice verena.
We should all be paying Hugo
|
|
|
|
Hugo de Wolf
{K:185110} 4/8/2004
|
And VERY time consuming. I like to print myself, but rarely find the time.....;o( In that case, it might very well be something to do with the level tweaking. Attached, i included a photo, adjusted to my own liking....;o)
Cheers,
Hugo
|
|
|
|
|
|
Verena Rentrop
{K:15233} 4/8/2004
|
@Hugo, I scan the negative directly without any printouts before...only working with the arc of contact and the negative...own printing is one of a lot of future projects...schedule completely open
|
|
|
|
|
Hugo de Wolf
{K:185110} 4/8/2004
|
Did you check the contact sheet or the print? Those might differ, as a single print may have been corrected seperately... Thanks!
Cheers,
Hugo
|
|
|
|
|
Verena Rentrop
{K:15233} 4/8/2004
|
@Hugo, this time I really did a exposure series with +/- 0.5 and this one was the best result in my personal opinion, but I'm not pretty sure which of them I finally used... and I checked again the arc of contact and in not one of them you're able to find black tones...
|
|
|
|
|
Hugo de Wolf
{K:185110} 4/8/2004
|
Somebody has been giving you a rating without leaving a comment..... Not very nice.
|
|
|
|
|
Hugo de Wolf
{K:185110} 4/8/2004
|
Hope not....;o) I like the very well balanced composition, and the basically simple scene. I still wonder, is it the print or a PS job that created the slightly off balance tonal range? (I mean, the white tones are definately there, and very prominently so, but there are no pitch black tones) Maybe it's a camera property. You might want to try putting the camera at -0.5 EV to compensate the seemingly but slightly overexposed image. Unless, that is, if you created this output deliberately.
Good day at work, today?
Cheers,
Hugo
|
|
|
|
|
Kevin Collier
{K:19076} 4/8/2004
|
Been there, done that. Good abstract comp ..
|
|
0 
