|
|
Jim Budrakey
{K:24393} 4/30/2005
|
Wow! this looks like a painting and no Photoshop. Where is this? It does not look like the famous Niagara falls.
I just have to spend some more time looking through your portfolio - your work is beautiful.
Also, I would like to thank you for the congratulations on my shot taking Best Color Photograph. The image itself is in my portfolio if you care to see the shot in detail.
|
|
|
|
|
Cemal Ekin
{K:2309} 11/24/2002
|
I must go to Shannock, it msut be around the corner from me. (Anywaher in RI is around the corner!) I like this one too for different reasons. The contrast between the orange and the blue is very good. The shape of the waterfall and the angle from which you approached it makes this a very good image. Highly memorable.
As an aside, I thought the other waterfall looked like the one at Kenyon Mill. Is it?
Cemal
|
|
|
|
|
Ingrid Mathews
{K:7277} 10/30/2002
|
Thank you everyone for your nice comments.
Sue- Sure, I would consider selling a print. Let me know what you have in mind. The reason for digital as the subject is because it was taken with a digital camera. I guess I should review the various categories more thoroughly. Thanks for bringing it to my attention.
This is taken in the small town of Shannock, Rhode Island.
|
|
|
|
|
Toni Martin
{K:5092} 10/30/2002
|
Terrific creativity and colors.
|
|
|
|
|
Kim Culbert
{K:37070} 10/30/2002
|
This is stunning! Great colours, and an interesting abstract! Most people would probably opt for the whole falls, and not see the creative image you've got here. I really like this one!
|
|
|
|
|
Steven B. Poitinger
{K:1757} 10/30/2002
|
Ingrid, this is great! Well seen color combinations and nice composition. Where is this?
|
|
|
|
|
Lauren Brush
{K:124} 10/30/2002
|
The complimentary colors alone would make it a beautiful abstract but the identifiable subject makes it even more appealing... flowing water, reflections, fall color...what more could you want?!
|
|
|
|
Sue O'S
{K:12878} 10/30/2002
|
Wow! THAT is a great photo. Good eye for seeing this! I could gaze at this in fascination for a long time. Would you consider selling a print of this?
But why "Subject: Digital" if there is no PS work done on it? I think that digital category is for things heavily altered from the original (such as http://www.usefilm.com/showphoto.php?id=25906, another beautifully done photo), not just because it's taken with a digital camera. I think a much better category would abstract.
|
|
0 
