|
Paul Lara
{K:88111} 1/12/2008
|
I SO know what you're talking about, Dave. Having shot for a year with a lil' Kodak 4 megapixel camera that would H U N T for focus and take forever doing it...I laid hands on the 20D, and knew I was in deep trouble. I HAD to have that camera. It took me 6 months, but I snagged it.
My reason for choosing this particular Sigma lens (28-70) was the constant 2.8 aperature. I love how a 200mm compresses backgrounds for portraits and fashion shooting, but I really wanted the ability to blur the background out.
|
|
|
Dave Arnold
{K:55680} 1/12/2008
|
WHAT???? I would NEVER do something like that, Paul! LOL
Looks like your new lens if fabulous, too. You know, I went into competitive camera while in Dallas on New Years eve to replace that Tamron lens I bought just last June. It is giving me fits and seems to have gotten full of dust. So I picked up that Sigma 18-200... I'm sold on Sigma lately, especially because of my love for my 10-20mm.
Of course, to demonstrate the lens, they had to throw it on a 40D.... which I've been craving. The rest is history.
|
|
|
Paul Lara
{K:88111} 1/12/2008
|
Thanks Dave. The sky was cloudless when I shot the bridge, so I went into my clouds folder and found an appropriately warm image. ;)
|
|
|
Dave Arnold
{K:55680} 1/12/2008
|
Nicely accomplished, composition is excellent and the structure forms a perfect frame for a great sky.
Best wishes, Dave
|
|
|
Jose Ignacio (Nacho) Garcia Barcia
{K:96391} 1/7/2008
|
great architecture.wonderful composition.
|
|
|
John Hatz
{K:156973} 1/6/2008
|
Interesting metalic part Paul, goes to abstract composition, nice texture and lighting support...
|
|
|
Paul Lara
{K:88111} 1/5/2008
|
Hey, thanks Carter.
|
|
|
Carter Driggs
{K:492} 1/5/2008
|
Beautifully done!
|
|