|
|
|
William Wilson
{K:380} 3/27/2006
|
hee hee i love this - made my day to read so much dreadful nonesense... have a better one
|
|
|
|
KEVIN TEMPLE
{K:8657} 3/13/2006
|
OK PAUL GOOD LUCK MY FRIEND AND GOOD FORTUNE
|
|
|
|
|
paul lovichi
{K:569} 3/13/2006
|
you really are a very big headed old man( with a surprisingly poor command of the english language.....i can hardly understand half your comments!) all i'll say is that i won't be darkening the door of your very obviously fragile photographic world again. if you think your photos are perfect and that you have nothing to learn, then you are a fool. then again, being the 'naughty boy' that i am maybe i'll start giving your photos an honest critique when they come up, to keep you up to date with reality. will be checking out w.d camera. as i said i really like some of your stuff.
|
|
|
|
|
KEVIN TEMPLE
{K:8657} 3/13/2006
|
Paul ,you naughty boy,I have told you,(can you not understand,In the firswt place your amature comments to one of my unreal !!!! images was to say the least way way over the top.All I done was to have a deco at your efforts (most very good)(come on I do know a good photo when I see one,Unfortunatley when I seen this out of focus, grab shot all I did was comment as to the out of charactor shot you did.Your constructive critisism regarding my image was the only one scrutinizing the image (like every pixel.(I could not give a rats A--e at what you seen that was (apparently wrong with the photo and will go on to say (how big is your magnifying glass) you must use to scrutinize images.(I personaly just could not be bothered.(Now I have told you you naughty boy,go and get some more of your better images on.In the future if you critisize ones photos,dont take the pet when someone critisizes yours.(I will assure you,you could not huff me)
By the by,Did you get WHAT DIGITAL CAMERA THIS MONTH.(I have been on all day signing copys with younsters with there tounges hanging out,(However)
|
|
|
|
|
paul lovichi
{K:569} 3/13/2006
|
this is very simple kevin, and after 4 replies you are unable to understand a simple concept. i took the time to make some constructive comments about one of your images. you took the huff and called one of my images 'rubbish', as you seem to be unable to critique it in any sensible manner. look up critique in your dictionary, apply what you read to this image, and tell WHY you think its rubbish. its easy, its how we learn and its the point of this site. i certainly won't take the huff like your good self, or say that you're not a good enough photographer to point out to me the flaws in this image. the difference between us is that i prefer when people take the time to point out ways of making an image better. you only seem to be here for an ego massage.
|
|
|
|
|
KEVIN TEMPLE
{K:8657} 3/13/2006
|
paul just look at the image man(that was the point of my KING WITH NO CLOTHS statement and if you think back it was you in thew first place that started this ball rolling.For the record it is abundantly clear you take good photographs.Take another look at the image and be honest, you where letting yourself wide open for critisism by acting out the expert touch in the first place.(If you can not take flack back then dont give it in the first place.By the by you have made my day I am coming up yto 59.Now listen stop being a bad boy and get on with what I know you can do (We all know you can do it
|
|
|
|
|
paul lovichi
{K:569} 3/13/2006
|
your comment doesn't make that much sense. you are so arrogant you can actually speak for everyone in dismissing this photo? except i imagine the folk that gave it a good critique. do you not understand the words 'constuctive critique'? saying an image is 'rubbish' and sticking to your 'my photo is better than yours', is not only childish but still doesn't tell me why you don't like this image. your acting like an 18 year old here, so was suprised to see on your profile that you must be about 50.
|
|
|
|
|
KEVIN TEMPLE
{K:8657} 3/11/2006
|
ok Paul (I was being kind)My honest opinion and I would say I would speak for most is,Basicly it is badly composed aqnd a bad idea in the first it is rubbish (and you know it ) and does not belong with your other work(which is very good)Take it of man it is doing you no good what so ever.(IF the images where reversed and yours was mine and mine was yours so to speak ,then I would have said your comments would have been justified.I realy dont mind being critisized but if one is critisizing (as you where,then you should expect so flack back.(end of saga End of saga)
|
|
|
|
|
KEVIN TEMPLE
{K:8657} 3/5/2006
|
no disrespect but when I read your comment regarding compostion I was expecting you photos to be a little better.This is like the king with no cloths sinario for want of a better phrase
|
|
|
|
Rashed Abdulla
{K:163889} 2/18/2006
|
Perfect expouser and a wonderful shutter , all of the best my friend .
|
|
|
|
Kambiz K
{K:37420} 2/18/2006
|
very creative and beautiful capture with great composition and colors
|
|
|
|
Kanwarpreet Singh
{K:1868} 2/18/2006
|
Very nice capture! Love the colours & the softness!
Regards.
kp
|
|
0 
