|
|
|
B:)liana
{K:30945} 11/3/2004
|
Beautiful, but I would add more contrast in Black IMHO!
Kisses, Biliana
|
|
|
|
Shiv Kumar Surya
{K:17362} 11/1/2004
|
Excellent capture of mood. Beautiful composition.
Thanks for visiting and nice comments on my photographs.
Regards,
'Surya'
|
|
|
|
Evina Schmidova
{K:2034} 5/14/2004
|
nice
|
|
|
|
|
Siddharth Siva
{K:3327} 4/11/2004
|
hmm true...but its not the exposure at all...but i just couldnt get the scanner to reproduce the print the way it looked (btw..if i may say so myslelf, the print looks gorgeous)..refer to two comments from the top of the list of this image.. thanks for your comments..quite enjoyed the learning experience our earlier exchange provided!
|
|
|
|
|
Vikram Bose-Mullick
{K:554} 4/11/2004
|
Metered incorrectly. The highlights on the whites are saturated. Considering the equipment used it is quite understandable.. To your credit, the model you have selected is gorgeous and makes the composition compelling despite the flaws.
|
|
|
|
|
Beth Callahan
{K:966} 1/24/2004
|
your work is amazing!! I have looked at your portfolio and am very impressed! I am sure you will be getting lots of work in Bombay. Good Luck!!
|
|
|
|
|
Bart Aldrich
{K:7614} 12/23/2002
|
Lovely model and print.
|
|
|
|
|
J
{K:2647} 11/25/2002
|
I like the pose. But it's a pitty that the dress reflects so much light. Also I have the impression that she is chewing or something. I do like the dress though, and the ambiance created by her expression.
Since you have a contrast problem and I love playing around with photos I have two different contrast versions for you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
William R Eastman III
{K:2141} 6/27/2002
|
The sleeves on the dress threw me. But I bet she has a great accent!
|
|
|
|
|
Siddharth Siva
{K:3327} 6/26/2002
|
hi..thanks for your comments guys! william...unfortunately what she is wearing is not an indian dress...its a designer outfit more on the lines of western attire! also the model, sophiya haque, is half british...yeah the other half is from the indian subcontinent!!
|
|
|
|
|
William R Eastman III
{K:2141} 6/26/2002
|
sorry--attachment--nothing was ordered from this print--you can understand why.
|
|
|
|
|
|
William R Eastman III
{K:2141} 6/26/2002
|
I was going to comment on this when you first posed it. I couldn't care less whether this is muddy or not. The pose, the image, the Indian dress...this is a lovely mood, and a lovely image. A Michelangelo by any other name. This is a lovely photograph. I like the sensitivity and the casualness of the pose. There is nothing to critique or improve here.
Some of my best photos have never had a single order--so much for art--attachment--not even a wallet.
I love the light on her cheeks and inner arm... From experience, there is nothing more beautiful than an Indian woman--except for my wife!
|
|
|
|
|
Terrence Kent
{K:7023} 6/26/2002
|
I can't say for sure, the general consensus of the chuckleheads i conferred with on this one was that you most likely have PS in a color space other than srgb, which is what IE uses. That would acct for the disparity, hope this helps and keep em comin sidd, toodles~
|
|
|
|
|
Siddharth Siva
{K:3327} 6/26/2002
|
Hi Terrence,
Thanks for all your comments! Yeah a strange thing happened..when i scanned this print and edited it for contrast, brightness, etc in PS, it looked fine but looked excessively contrasty and dark in internet explorer..so I had to actually compensate for that in PS. It eventually looked very bright and low contrast in PS but seemed to look fine in internet explorer. Do you know whats going on???
|
|
|
|
|
Terrence Kent
{K:7023} 6/26/2002
|
Has a very classic and relaxed feel to it, the contrast does make it appear muddy but that's probably a just web display issue~
|
|
0 
