|
|
|
John Hatziemmanouil
{K:40580} 10/31/2003
|
Nice reflections and very good exposure. The quality looks nice. Pitty about the size however this is not something that I can critique it bad.
|
|
|
|
|
Kostas Kyriacopoulos
{K:42} 2/22/2002
|
First, I would like to thank you all for your comments. Since I am new to photography I read them very carefully. Taking into consideration what you said I used PS to sharpen the image. You were absolutely right. I have attached the new image.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Petros Stamatakos
{K:12101} 2/22/2002
|
Ok... Just to clear something up... I've seen the slide, and it's immaculate... It can't get any sharper than what it is... This post is however a streight scan. Kosta never used the "unsharp mask", and had he done so, it would have helped the image a lot. I know that Kosta waited for a while to get the lighting perfect, and I think he's nailed it.
One of the best shots of Melbourne I have ever seen. Well done Kosta!
|
|
|
|
Bob Jarman
{K:3145} 2/22/2002
|
Kostas,
I think this is a wonderful image that has the possibility of being a real wall banger. The colours are beautiful, especially the sky and the reflections.
The two things I notice that you might consider are:
1: The image is soft. check your slide, if it is tack sharp, you lost detail in the scan. Rescan it and apply some sharpening to clear it up. Sharpness in this shot is imperative, in my opinion.
2: Not much you can do about it without a tilt-shift lens but the buildings are leaning backwards. If you understand photoshop well, there are some things you could try to straighten the perspective but I am not, and I am not sure if it would work in this situation. Or you could buy a w/a tilt shift lens! :)
All that said I think this is still a very nice image. Good capture!
Bob
|
|
|
|
Jeroen Wenting
{K:25317} 2/22/2002
|
Composition is good, but it seems slightly soft. Also, try to avoid the vignetting in the corners.
Apart from that, very nice shot. Well exposed for effect.
|
|
0 
