|
|
|
Paco Ferrer
{K:8586} 5/7/2003
|
Good Image. I think that the lack of sharpness, some people complain about, actually suits the subject.
|
|
|
|
|
shelby koning
{K:5450} 5/4/2003
|
I love the mood of this, and I find that there is a good deal of detail and texture in this very small image that makes me wish for a closer look, 200 kb just doesn't do justice to most prints. Beautiful work.
|
|
|
|
|
Miguel Lasa
{K:62} 1/4/2003
|
I like the sepia color good composition
|
|
|
|
|
Antonio Díaz
{K:2710} 1/3/2003
|
hi james! if you?re interested, go to the following link:
http://www.usefilm.com/articles/sharpness/
this will make your images look just like the original print... hope it helps!
cheers!!!
BTW, very interesting shot!
|
|
|
|
|
james mickelson
{K:7344} 1/3/2003
|
Marc, I guess you didn't read my explaination carefully. There were no other angles due to the fact that this room is barricaded with heavy wire. To the left is a trashpile and to the right is a jumble of other junk. Shot vertically the window dominates the scene and it is filthy. So with careful camera movements with a 90mm lens and amx movements, this is the best there was available in this building. Wre it 20 years ago I could have truned the bed, or stood it on it's head. The print is sumptuos with all kinds of detail in the window. My lack of computer skills doesn't allow me to bring out the detail that is here. I am a printer not a photoshop wiz. This print is so detailed, you can see the dead bed bugs.
|
|
|
|
|
Marc Gougenheim
{K:5398} 1/3/2003
|
No other angle available ? Mmmm... That sounded strange enough to be worth a reply...:-)
What about moving the bed, then ? For example, turning it so that it is vertically oriented "under" the window in a vertical frame...?
|
|
|
|
|
james mickelson
{K:7344} 1/3/2003
|
I agree with this assessment. Unfortunately there are no other angles here. I have the lens thrust through the wire mesh that is prevalent in this ghost town. In the print there is all kinds of detail visible. Again the limitations of my abilities regarding posting to the net doesn't tell the tale of this print at all.
|
|
|
|
|
Marc Gougenheim
{K:5398} 1/3/2003
|
First of al, I like the mood here... Second, the picture is too small to really enjoy it. Then, I'm not too comfortable with the way you used the necessary distortions of your lens... Meaning that to me they work half way with this angle. It seems that the highlights are a bit hot as well... If you have a chance, I think the subject is well worth a study about angles... Could be really great. As it is, it's quite good, but doesn't entirely win my heart... Regards.
|
|
0 
