|
|
Paul Lara
{K:88111} 3/25/2006
|
wow, this is quite strong: low-key and dramatically back-lit.
|
|
|
|
Martin Mora
{K:4666} 3/21/2006
|
Better than good, its OUTSTANDING! very glad I took a closer look at it :) well done!
|
|
|
|
Hermen Pen
{K:9168} 10/14/2005
|
Although the light was low, I think the light on the feathers is really beautiful! It may indeed be a good idea to make the overall image a little lighter as was suggested before.
|
|
|
|
Thilo Bayer
{K:50358} 10/7/2005
|
Hi Arwa,
in PS CS2, there is a really good noise reduction filter. For CS1 or earlier PS versions, you need an external filter like neat image or other things. just try google with "noise reduction filter" =)
Thilo
|
|
|
|
|
Lee Harris
{K:14694} 10/7/2005
|
I like it as it is.
lol your fist attempt....hec it is better then my 100th attempt.
Look very forward to your future attempts.
Kind Regards
Lee
|
|
|
|
|
arwa abdullah
{K:34415} 10/6/2005
|
thank you so much my dear friend! i agree with what you said and i liked your work! thank you
|
|
|
|
|
arwa abdullah
{K:34415} 10/6/2005
|
A plug in photoshop filter? You kinda lost me there! im still at ABCs level with photoshop!
thanx my friend!
hugs!
|
|
|
|
|
arwa abdullah
{K:34415} 10/6/2005
|
Thank you james! I added ISO so I could use a higher shutter speed! I liked your right in the face but oh so kind critique ;)
Thanx 
|
|
|
|
|
Thilo Bayer
{K:50358} 10/6/2005
|
Hi Arwa,
reducing noise is not so easy. you need a tool that does that selectively. the best thing is to use a filter and then paint the noise reduction with the history brush of PS on the areas that needed the noise reduction.
best wishes, Thilo
|
|
|
|
|
arwa abdullah
{K:34415} 10/6/2005
|
I used high iso so I could increase the shutter speed that?s why its so grainy
I tried reducing the noise but it felt as if im using some details along the way! Why dose that happen?
I agree about the light!
|
|
|
|
|
Thilo Bayer
{K:50358} 10/6/2005
|
Hi Arwa,
you may light up the image and reduce the noise as Margaret and Bint showed. besides that, the detail is great! so, you've a new lens baby? =)
Hugs, Thilo
|
|
|
|
Hanggan Situmorang
{K:37833} 10/6/2005
|
Great, so powerful, Arwa!
|
|
|
|
|
Laurie Gould
{K:11942} 10/5/2005
|
Great capture especially since you took it from a boat! Jan is right, the exposure on these birds can be difficult. Well done. :)
|
|
|
|
|
Omar Rifaat
{K:10141} 10/5/2005
|
fantastic!!! 7++++++ this is a great one. It makes me gasp!
The light on the feathers is lovely too....
impressive!
Omar
|
|
|
|
|
Bint Ahmed
{K:333} 10/5/2005
|
i hope you like what i did i just reduce the noise
|
|
|
|
|
Marcus Armani
{K:36599} 10/5/2005
|
Hi Arwa, I think Its very good, The dark lighting makes him look majestic. I think you got a wonderful shot of him, really great considering you were on a boat with a new lens.
I dont even have a pic of one of these eagles yet! keep up the great shooting.
Marcus
|
|
|
|
|
James Hager
{K:6285} 10/5/2005
|
Good and bad. :) Good: inflight image that's sharp, nice pose so you can see its form and especially its head and eye, interesting light filtering through its feathers. Bad: it's on the dark side, and its grainy/noisy. Overall, the good outweighs the bad. Nice work. Keep shooting.
|
|
|
|
Mohamed Banna
{K:34237} 10/5/2005
|
nice great shot , i'm with Margaret Sturgess in the light adgustment
|
|
|
|
|
Margaret Sturgess
{K:49403} 10/5/2005
|
Arwa don't know enough about how to take the shot in te first place, Den is the one who uses he larger lenses and does bird shots in the air. But I have had a go to adjusted this - see what you think
Margaret
|
|
|
|
|
ARMANDO ALCÁZAR
{K:42404} 10/5/2005
|
Dear Arwa, really this pic is not good...... Is exellent!!!! congrats my dear friend!! God bless you
|
|
|
|
|
Jan de Olde
{K:399} 10/5/2005
|
Considering the cìcrumstances I don't think you could have done much better. The image is underexposed but at the same time the back of the eagles had is already almost overexposed.
The composition is good, focus is good, diafragma looks good all you needed whas the sun behind you instead of behind the eagle.
Sometimes you need a bit of luck too. ;-)
|
|
0 
