|
|
|
Ken Alexander
{K:3905} 2/13/2003
|
Erlend, I have to agree with Don about the excessive contrast, but it's a really nice shot anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
Erlend Mørk
{K:145} 2/13/2003
|
Thanks for all your comments. The burned out highlights yes. I somehow burned them out when I toned the picture. I just didn't notice it. But it's all there in the original negative. I'll be more careful next time. Too bad I can't fix this version here..
|
|
|
|
Don Loseke
{K:32503} 2/13/2003
|
The composition is good. The technique is not so good. The highlights are blocked up with no detail. Too much grain. The idea is very good.
|
|
|
|
|
Deleted User
{K:4598} 2/13/2003
|
Actually I think having the boys face in shade lends to the feeling of "discontact". Interesting capture which seems to lead to different interpretations.
|
|
|
|
|
Andy Eulass
{K:13435} 2/13/2003
|
Wonderfully simple yet effective composition. I don't think that seeing the boy's face here is essential, but it would be a small additional asset to the picture. I particularly like how this compels me to ask questions about what the boy is thinking and what occurred just before the shot was taken. Story-telling at its best. Well done.
|
|
|
|
|
Aaron Charlton Smith
{K:625} 2/13/2003
|
Cute, =) Reminds me of fishing as a younger boy.
|
|
|
|
|
D. Richard Knorr
{K:48} 2/13/2003
|
There is something wonderful about that sky. It really guides you in to the subject.
|
|
|
|
|
paul durrant
{K:1047} 2/13/2003
|
quite a nice shot! the path gives the scene a good depth and the gesture by the person in the back creates some interest. shame we can't see the expression on the boy's face. good work!
|
|
0 
